Selling is not about relationships.
Our sister program, the Sales Executive Council, made this bold statement on Harvard Business Review’s blog last week, creating a firestorm of divisive comments.
To sum up their research, every sales person falls into one of five types. The highest performing “type” is the challenger, the salesperson who uses their deep understanding of their customers’ business to push their thinking and take control of the sales conversation. The other types, the relationship-builders, hard workers, reactive problem solvers, and lone wolves don’t match the challengers’ performance.
In this post, I propose, what if communicating wasn’t about relationships either? What if your focus on developing strong personal and professional relationships with your clients and generously giving your time to meet those client’s every need was a misguided, and likely draining, approach to your job?
Let’s give this a try.
In the HBR post, the SEC researchers describe the three traits and skills of Challengers. What if, just for fun, we replaced “Challengers” with “Communicators,” “customers” with “internal clients,” and “sales conversation” with “communication request”? Here would be the definition of a challenger communicator and their three key attributes:
Communicators use their deep understanding of their internal clients’ business to push their thinking and take control of the communication request. They’re not afraid to share even potentially controversial views and are assertive—with both their internal clients and bosses.
- Communicators teach their internal clients. They focus the communication request not on the channels but on insight, bringing a unique (and typically provocative) perspective on the internal client’s business. Read More »
Can leaders do anything right? A lot of our work over the last few years – especially on
We have just released the
In my time with CEC, I’ve been involved in a variety of projects. My latest, looking at what Communications can do to improve workplace safety, has been the one that’s been easiest to get excited about! Members we’ve spoken with have been more passionate about this subject than any other I’ve discussed with them, and I guess it’s kind of rubbed off!
I can teach you how to swim. It can be any stroke you want. You probably know some freestyle and you’ve heard butterfly is hard, right? Butterfly it is. You probably won’t be as good as Michael Phelps or win any gold medals but you can swim butterfly. Because I’ll tell you a secret; butterfly is easy. Sure, it’s probably the most tiring way to swim from one side of the pool to the other, but there isn’t anything mechanically difficult about it.
If someone asked you today how you feel about your job you might say all positive things—you’re on a roll on your current project, you’ve gotten some good feedback recently from your manager, and right now you’re contributing to the organization in a way that you might not get to do elsewhere. But how did you feel about your job six months ago? And do you think you’ll still be at your company in a year?
Most crisis communications plans that I see are robust when it comes to controlling the things that companies can control. For example, most plans comprehensively outline escalation rules, crisis team org charts, calling chains, initial holding statements, etc. These are the resources whose applicability can be predicted with relative certainty, regardless of the crisis.
The media are always after a good story. That is of course unless they already have one that is too big for them to handle. And sometimes, you may think that an unfortunate piece of bad press can do great damage to your company’s reputation only to have it never gain traction in the press.
In our recent toolkit for
Recent Comments